Xeon E5-2620 v3 Review: Affordable 6-Core CPU for Entry-Level Builds

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 processor photo

The Xeon E5‑2620 v3 is an entry‑level six‑core CPU. It doesn’t stand out on paper, but it’s very inexpensive and works even on low‑end X99 boards.

Specifications

ModelXeon e5 2620 v3
SocketLGA2011-3
Release DateQ3 2014
ArchitectureHaswell-EP, 22 nm
Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Memory supportDDR4-1866, 4-channel
Base Frequency 2400 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency 3200 MHz (1-2 Cores)
2900 MHz (3 Cores)
2800 MHz (4 Cores)
2700 MHz (5 Cores)
2600 MHz (6 Cores)
Extensions & Features MMX instructions
SSE / Streaming SIMD Extensions
SSE2 / Streaming SIMD Extensions 2
SSE3 / Streaming SIMD Extensions 3
SSSE3 / Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extensions 3
SSE4 / SSE4.1 + SSE4.2 / Streaming SIMD Extensions 4
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard instructions
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions
AVX2 / Advanced Vector Extensions 2.0
BMI / BMI1 + BMI2 / Bit Manipulation instructions
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion instructions
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add instructions
EM64T / Extended Memory 64 technology / Intel 64
HT / Hyper-Threading technology
VT-x / Virtualization technology
VT-d / Virtualization for directed I/O
TBT 2.0 / Turbo Boost technology 2.0
NX / XD / Execute disable bit ?
TXT / Trusted Execution technology
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep technology
L3 Cache 15 Mb
PCIe Lanes40, Gen 3.0
TDP 85 W
Maximum operating temperature 73°C
MultiplierLocked
Integrated GraphicsNone
CPUID0x306F2
Approximate Price$2 - $5 (Aliexpress)
Main advantages in 2025:

  • Six cores; acceptable multi‑threaded performance for the price
  • Low heat output; no need for expensive tower coolers
  • Low power draw; runs on entry‑level boards
  • Very low price

Main disadvantages:

  • Aging architecture; lower IPC versus current CPUs
  • Low stock clocks (improves with TBU)
  • Maximum memory frequency of 1866 MHz (quad‑channel helps bandwidth)
AIDA64 memory bandwidth on Xeon E5-2620 v3 with quad-channel DDR4-1866
Despite the low RAM frequency, quad‑channel reaches ~45 GB/s.

Overclocking Capability

Turbo Boost Unlock

Turbo Boost Unlock on Xeon E5 v3 forces the maximum single‑core turbo ratio across all cores. It leverages an undocumented Haswell‑EP quirk, not an official feature. Applied via methods such as a BIOS mod with S3TurboTool, it typically yields 10–30% multi‑threaded gains, depending on SKU and cooling. Expect higher sustained power and temperatures; use strong cooling and make sure the motherboard VRM can handle the load.

TBU is widely used in the X99 community; without it, performance in many modern apps and games is often insufficient.

Base Clock (BCLK) Overclocking

Some retail X99 boards allow a small BCLK increase (about 3–5%), which brings only minor gains. It can be used alone or together with TBU.

E5-2620 v3 nearly maximum BCLK on a retail X99 board
Nearly maximum base clock overclocking on a retail X99 board

Performance and Tests

All tests below were run with TBU enabled. Multi‑threaded performance is decent; per‑core speed is still far from modern CPUs.

CPU‑Z
CPU‑Z multi-thread benchmark for Xeon E5‑2620 v3 with TBU

Cinebench R15, R20, R23

CPU Mark
PassMark CPU Mark result for E5‑2620 v3 with TBU

Blender (BMW)
Blender BMW render time on E5‑2620 v3 with TBU

AIDA64 CPU Queen
AIDA64 CPU Queen score for E5‑2620 v3 with TBU

Corona 1.3
Corona 1.3 render benchmark on E5‑2620 v3 with TBU

Summary

Xeon E5 2620 v3 (TBU)
CPU-Z (single)~340
CPU-Z (multi)~2650
Cinebench R15~940
Cinebench R20~2180
Cinebench R23~5600
CPU Mark~7000
Blender (BMW)~06:24
AIDA64 CPU Queen~56000
Corona 1.3~03:35

Similar models in terms of multi‑threaded performance level:

ModelCores / ThreadsCinebench R15Cinebench R20Cinebench R23CPU-Z Multi
Xeon E5-2620 v3 (TBU)6c / 12t~940~2180~5600~2650
Xeon E5-2640 v3 (TBU)8c / 16t~1300~2900~7700~3800
Xeon E5-1650 v46c / 12t~1200~2500~6400~3500
Ryzen 3 31004c / 8t~900~2250~5800~2700
Core i5-9400F6c / 6t~980~2400~5900~2700

Gaming Performance

With TBU applied, the CPU can serve as a budget gaming option. It handles most esports titles and shows smooth FPS in games well optimized for multi‑threading. However, modest clocks and weak IPC won’t deliver good results in CPU‑heavy projects.

  • Games up to 2020: 80% run well (60+ FPS), 10% are playable (40–60 FPS), 10% are unplayable (low FPS, stutter)
  • Games 2020–2025: 60% run well (60+ FPS), 25% are playable (40–60 FPS), 15% are unplayable (low FPS, stutter)

Most suitable graphics cards for Full HD and 1440p: NVIDIA 1070 (Ti), 1660 (Super/Ti), 2060 (Super), 3060 Ti; AMD RX 580, RX 5600 XT, RX 5700 XT, RX 6600 (XT).

Stock vs Unlock Performance:


Performance with RTX 3070 Ti:

Close Alternatives

  • Xeon E5‑2640 v3 — 8/16, 3.4 GHz all‑core (TBU needed)
  • Xeon E5‑2643 v3 — 6/12, 3.7 GHz all‑core (TBU needed)
  • Xeon E5‑2643 v4 — 6/12, 3.6 GHz all‑core (no unlock needed), faster memory support
  • Xeon E5‑1650 v4 — 6/12, 3.8 GHz all‑core (no unlock needed), faster memory support

See the complete LGA2011‑3 CPU list.

Revisions

Besides the retail version, there are engineering samples of the E5‑2620 v3. They can be identified by the s‑spec code laser‑marked on the heatspreader (IHS). The retail code is SR207. The revision is also shown in the HWiNFO utility. Xeon E5‑2620 v3 s‑spec codes photo

S‑spec Code Stepping Version
QGSH R2 QS/ES
SR207 R2 Final

Frequently Asked Questions

Is undervolting possible?

Yes, voltage control is possible on v3 processors. Some ES models may be exceptions.

Is there solder or thermal paste under the lid?

There is solder under the lid, as with the entire Xeon E5 v3/v4 lineup.

Is the processor compatible with Win11?

No, the Xeon E5‑2620 v3 is not officially supported by Windows 11, but it works if you bypass the CPU and TPM checks during installation.

Final Verdict

The Xeon E5‑2620 v3 runs cool, doesn’t draw much power, and handles everyday tasks. With TBU it can run a fair share of modern games, but performance headroom is limited. Given current prices on LGA2011‑3, nearby options like the 8‑core E5‑2640 v3 or the higher‑clocked 6‑core E5‑1650 v4 often make more sense; both work fine on simple boards and don’t require heavy cooling.

Leave a Comment