Xeon E5-2630 v4 Review

Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4

Xeon E5‑2630 v4 is one of the entry‑level 10‑core processors for LGA2011‑3. It’s a cool‑running, energy‑efficient model with decent multi‑threaded performance, but low all‑core frequency under full load.

The processor is often found in prebuilt systems sold on AliExpress and other marketplaces. Let’s see what this model can do today and whether it’s worth considering as a super‑budget foundation for a home PC.

Specifications

ModelXeon e5 2630 v4
SocketLGA2011-3
Release DateQ1 2016
ArchitectureBroadwell-EP, 14 nm
Cores / Threads 10 / 20
Memory supportDDR4-2133, 4-channel
Base Frequency 2300 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency 3100 MHz (1-2 Cores)
2900 MHz (3 Cores)
2900 MHz (4 Cores)
2700 MHz (5 Cores)
2600 MHz (6 Cores)
2500 MHz (7 Cores)
2400 MHz (8-10 Cores)
Extensions & Features MMX instructions
SSE / Streaming SIMD Extensions
SSE2 / Streaming SIMD Extensions 2
SSE3 / Streaming SIMD Extensions 3
SSSE3 / Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extensions 3
SSE4 / SSE4.1 + SSE4.2 / Streaming SIMD Extensions 4
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard instructions
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions
AVX2 / Advanced Vector Extensions 2.0
BMI / BMI1 + BMI2 / Bit Manipulation instructions
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion instructions
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add instructions
EM64T / Extended Memory 64 technology / Intel 64
HT / Hyper-Threading technology
VT-x / Virtualization technology
VT-d / Virtualization for directed I/O
TBT 2.0 / Turbo Boost technology 2.0
TSX / Transactional Synchronization Extensions
NX / XD / Execute disable bit ?
TXT / Trusted Execution technology
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep technology
L3 Cache 25 Mb
PCIe Lanes40, Gen 3.0
TDP 85 W
Maximum operating temperature 74°C
MultiplierLocked
Integrated GraphicsNone
CPUID0x406F1
Approximate Price$2 - $5 (Aliexpress)

Main advantages of the model in 2025:

  • Many cores, decent level of multi‑threaded performance
  • Very low heat generation, no need for expensive coolers
  • Very low power consumption, ability to run on the cheapest boards
  • Very low price

Main disadvantages:

  • Quite old architecture, low IPC compared to current CPUs
  • Very low clock frequency
  • Maximum memory frequency of only 2133 MHz (though it supports quad‑channel)

Overclocking Capability

The processor has a locked multiplier, which prevents overclocking for most users. Only some branded motherboards can slightly raise the base clock, increasing frequency by 2–3%, but such overclocking doesn’t change the overall picture.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 — minor BCLK overclock on a branded board
Minor base‑clock overclocking on a branded board

Performance and Tests

All synthetic tests confirm the obvious: while the E5‑2630 v4 delivers respectable multi‑threaded results, its single‑threaded performance leaves much to be desired.

CPU‑Z

Xeon E5-2630 v4 — CPU-Z benchmark

Cinebench R15, R20, R23, 2024

PassMark

Xeon E5-2630 v4 — PassMark CPU Mark result

3DMark Time Spy

Xeon E5-2630 v4 — 3DMark Time Spy result

Summary

Xeon E5 2640 v4
CPU-Z (single)~340
CPU-Z (multi)~3700
Cinebench R15~1300
Cinebench R20~3000
Cinebench R23~7650
Cinebench 2024~460
PassMark (Multithread)~11500
3DMark Time Spy (CPU)~6700

See more synthetic and gaming tests in the video:

Similar Models (multi‑threaded performance)

ModelCores / ThreadsCinebench R15Cinebench R20Cinebench R23CPU-Z Multi
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v410c / 20t~1300~3000~7650~3700
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v412c / 24t~1550~3640~9400~4700
Intel Core i7-8700K6c / 12t~1450~3500~9200~4000
AMD Ryzen 5 36006c / 12t~1550~3600~9200~4200

As you can see, more modern CPUs need fewer cores to achieve similar multi‑threaded results, which once again highlights the E5‑2630 v4’s weak single‑thread performance.

Gaming Performance

Xeon E5‑2630 v4 is clearly not a gaming processor, so don’t expect comfortable FPS in all titles. The low frequency won’t deliver smooth FPS in CPU‑intensive games. A small consolation is that the processor belongs to the LCC (Low Core Count) family, which can provide slightly lower memory latency than higher‑core models.

However, it can handle well‑optimized multi‑threaded games and does fine in most esports titles.

  • Games up to 2020: 75% run well (60+ FPS), 15% are playable (40–60 FPS), 10% are unplayable (low FPS, stutters, micro‑stutters).
  • Games 2020–2025: 50% run well (60+ FPS), 30% are playable (40–60 FPS), 20% are unplayable (low FPS, stutters, micro‑stutters).

If you’re choosing a very budget gaming solution, our advice is to add just a little more and get a higher‑frequency CPU, for example the Xeon E5‑2680 v4.

Most suitable graphics cards for Full HD and 1440p: Nvidia 1070 (Ti), 1660 (Ti/Super), 2060 (Super), 3060 (Ti); AMD RX 580, RX 5600 (XT), RX 5700 (XT), RX 6600 (XT).

Performance with RX 580 (2048SP 8 GB):

Performance with RX 6600:

Close Alternatives

  • Xeon E5‑2643 — only 6 cores but much higher frequency
  • Xeon E5‑2640 v4 — essentially the same as the E5‑2630 v4, but with a slightly higher clock
  • Xeon E5‑2650 v4 — 2 more cores and +100 MHz all‑core; also not demanding about the motherboard
  • Xeon E5‑2680 v4 — 14/28, higher frequency, more cache. A reasonable upper limit for budget boards.

See the complete list of processors for socket 2011‑3 here.

Revisions

Besides the final version, there are also engineering versions of the E5‑2630 v4. They can be identified by the S‑spec code engraved on the heat spreader. The final version has code SR2R7. The stepping/revision can also be determined using the HWiNFO utility.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 — S-spec codes on IHS

S‑spec code Stepping Version
SR2R7 R0 Final
QKET R0 QS/ES
QKRH R0 QS/ES
QHVK L0 QS/ES

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TBU (Turbo Boost Unlock) possible?
No, TBU is only possible on Haswell (v3) processors.

Is undervolting possible?
Only for QS models; in final versions the ability to undervolt is locked.

Is there solder or thermal paste under the lid?
There’s solder under the heat spreader, as with the entire Xeon E5 v3/v4 lineup.

Is the processor compatible with Windows 11?
No, the Xeon E5‑2630 v4 is not officially supported by Windows 11, but it works fine if you bypass the CPU requirements.